File Name: theory of change in monitoring and evaluation .zip
This article is a brief study of the advantages and disadvantages of Theory of Change ToC and the Logical Framework Log Frame based on literature; a comparative approach. The later has a long historical stand in the development practices while the former was formed as supposed to answer the shortcomings of the Log Frame.
Tag Cloud. Program-level evaluation. Impact assessment. Evaluative culture. Core Principles. Research-to-outcome-to-impact pathway. Project-level ToC. BDC-level ToC. Program-level OLM. How we work. Monitoring of outcomes. Definition of key terms. Reporting System. Reporting Schedule. Inception Reports. Six-monthly Reports.
Annual Reports. Peer-Assist Evaluation of Annual Reports. Financial Reporting. Completion Reports. Reporting requirements. Examples of filled-in OLMs. Deriving a compliance milestone plan. Gantt Chart. Collecting SC Stories. Selecting MSC stories.
Giving MSC feedback. MSC story verification. Use of MSC stories. BDC-level Monitoring System. Publications and Links. Frequently Asked Questions. CPWF Website. Learning to Innovate Website. A theory of change is the causal or cause-effect logic that links research activities to the desired changes in the actors that a project or program is targeting to change. It describes the tactics and strategies, including working through partnerships and networks, thought necessary to achieve the desired changes in the target actors.
A theory of change provides a model of how a project or a program is supposed to work. In other words it provides a road map of where the project is trying to reach. Monitoring and evaluation tests and refines the road map while communications helps in reaching the destination by helping to bring about change.
The value of testing and refining the model is that it challenges pre-conceptions, aids reflection and helps staff regularly ask themselves 'are we doing the right thing to achieve the changes we want to see? Regularly asking this question, and responding to the answer, is essential good practice for any research-for-development project or program.
Follow CompassforSbc. Click here to access this Guide in Arabic. It is a living document that should be referred to and updated on a regular basis. This will ensure there is a system in place to monitor the program and evaluate success. This guide is designed primarily for program managers or personnel who are not trained researchers themselves but who need to understand the rationale and process of conducting research. This guide can help managers to support the need for research and ensure that research staff have adequate resources to conduct the research that is needed to be certain that the program is evidence based and that results can be tracked over time and measured at the end of the program.
Community-based change initiatives often have ambitious goals, and so planning specific on-the-ground strategies to those goals is difficult. Likewise, the task of planning and carrying out evaluation research that can inform practice and surface broader lessons for the field in general is a challenge. Theories of change ToC are vital to evaluation success for a number of reasons. Programmes need to be grounded in good theory. By developing a theory of change based on good theory, managers can be better assured that their programmes are delivering the right activities for the desired outcomes.
A clear framework is essential to guide monitoring and evaluation. A framework should explain how the programme is supposed to work by laying out the components of the initiative and the order or the steps needed to achieve the desired results. Why are monitoring and evaluation frameworks important? A well thought out monitoring and evaluation framework can assist greatly with thinking through programmatic strategies, objectives and planned activities, and whether they are indeed the most appropriate ones to implement. Monitoring and evaluation frameworks:.
A Theory of Change approach to planning and evaluation is increasingly being considered an essential practice for many organisations, This is the final paper, number 16, of our Monitoring and Evaluation Planning Series. .pdf (mb).
All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required. Background: Evaluation of community and public engagement in research is important to deepen understanding of how engagement works and to enhance its effectiveness. Theories of change have been recommended for evaluating community engagement, for their ability to make explicit intended outcomes and understandings of how engagement activities contribute to these outcomes. However, there are few documented examples of using theories of change for evaluation of engagement.
In contrast to the logframe and other explanatory models, Theory of Change starts with the overall vision of success or long-term goals and works backwards to the necessary conditions in place to produce these goals. A thorough Theory of Change unravels and seeks evidence of all assumptions underlying these conditions.
Jump to navigation. This section explains how and why you might use a theory of change when commissioning and managing an evaluation. It explains options for how it will be developed or revised, how it will be represented, and how it will be used. You might be actively involved in these processes or oversight them.
Theory of Change ToC is a specific type of methodology for planning , participation , and evaluation that is used in companies, philanthropy , not-for-profit and government sectors to promote social change. Theory of Change defines long-term goals and then maps backward to identify necessary preconditions. Theory of Change explains the process of change by outlining causal linkages in an initiative, i. The identified changes are mapped — as the "outcomes pathway" — showing each outcome in logical relationship to all the others, as well as chronological flow. The links between outcomes are explained by "rationales" or statements of why one outcome is thought to be a prerequisite for another. The innovation of Theory of Change lies 1 in making the distinction between desired and actual outcomes and 2 in requiring stakeholders to model their desired outcomes before they decide on forms of intervention to achieve those outcomes. Theory of Change can begin at any stage of an initiative, depending on the intended use.
(ToC) approach into its monitoring, evaluation and learning framework. This brief imstea.org
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *